A large numbers of people complained that they could not log in websites or could not update their blogs when the earthquake in Taiwan disrupted the internet access. Nowadays, many people can not live without internet which really plays a significant role in almost all the fields in citizens’ lives. To me, internet doesn’t only provide abundance of information or widen the space of journalism. What’s more, it changes citizens’ expression habits even living habits. And this change can be seen obviously in mainland china these years.
First of all, citizens get more chances and freedom to express themselves than any other periods. In my opinion, human being has the nature to express his/her own opinion towards the issues around them. But the traditional media were controlled by professional journalists, editors, and TV and radio participators. Thus the freedom to talk and expression is actually dominated by few people before the age of internet coming. Common people do not have a legal space (in mainland china, the situation is more serious) which is big and convenient enough to challenge the reporting and opinions from newspaper, magazines as well as TV programs. We get used to listen to but not think when things happen. However, web provides the space. Just like Keith W. Jenkins said in his article that “web is a tool to talk to another”. Internet indeed gives the roots a forum to express themselves, meanwhile stimulates the citizens to observe the world more seriously and deeply. In the past ten years, countless internet forums were built in China, such as Xicihutong, Tianya, and thousands of people log in those forums more than one times to post their articles and read the other’s stories every day. To the year of 2004, the blogs has become hot, and more people join the troop of expression themselves. It is said that there are about 17.5million bloggers in China today. The citizens who are the actors and actresses of news that journalists reported in the past are writing down their own stories via internet. This tool helps the citizens to think and write as journalists. They challenge the journalism; what is more important, they get the wisdom and right to challenge the authorities.
This phenomenon reduces the power of traditional media and asks for higher quality of journalism. Because of the political situation of China, the freedom of expression is still under control of the government. Although citizens could contribute to newspaper and magazines and so on, people’s voices are supervised by the rulers, and the supervision was easy to achieve before the coming of internet That is to say people only knew the issues that the government wanted you know; and just say what the government wanted you to say. So in the past, for many cases, victims had no idea to redress an injustice and get the support from public. But internet overcomes the problem partly.
More and more people start making use of the internet to state their conditions that can not be published in the traditional media and fight for their own rights. “Heaven Garden( blocked yet) ” is a website built for the female victim , Huang Jing(黄静) who died at home last year. The local police treated her case as naturally death but her parents pointed out some doubtful points which were accepted by policemen and court. Some of the protesters built the website to fight against the government’s behavior. Although the website was blocked, the influence of the case has already spread out. And there are also some successful examples like Liao Mengjun’s(廖梦君) case. His father still maintains the blog and fight for his son. (The EastSouthWestNorth, an English blog, excerpts some parts of his blog too). Those are no longer little-known cases, via internet, more Chinese start to pay attention to these stories and think about the things which happen to the people far from them. So to me, internet is widening the citizen’s eyesight and is changing people’s (including journalists’) thinking step by step in China.
Enhancing the readers’ power, internet requires more from the journalists actually. I strongly agree on one comment that said after Keith W. Jenkins’s article “Professional journalists still do more original reporting than bloggers do, but the pros don’t do as much as they think they do, and the bloggers do more than they get credit for.” To me bloggers can’t replace the journalists, because of the limitations of time, resource and energy. But with the supervision and competition of readers, journalists should be more professional and credible.